call anthropology crystallized cosmology and to term every person the projection of his respective world and that world’s Lord. How is this antithesis to be bridged?”1 Indeed, whether Paul even thought in terms of persons is a debated question.2 I think that he did, but not with an abstract or individualistic concept “person.” Rather, he displays a functional understanding of human beings as relationally constituted agents who are both embodied and embedded in their world. Exploring that understanding